The Epidemiology of Radial Tunnel Syndrome and Its Overlap With Lateral Epicondylitis.

PURPOSE: Radial tunnel syndrome (RTS) is characterized by nerve compression affecting the posterior interosseous nerve branch in the forearm, and its symptoms often overlap with those of lateral epicondylitis (LE). The purpose of this study was to examine the epidemiology of RTS, frequency of injections and surgical release, and overlap of RTS with LE. METHODS: We queried the PearlDiver database to identify RTS in patients older than 18 years. Demographic data, diagnostic or therapeutic injection within 30 days of diagnosis, surgical release within 1 year of diagnosis, and 90-day postoperative complication rates were evaluated. Using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, laterality codes, we also determined the number of patients who had same-side RTS and LE and the proportion of patients who subsequently underwent simultaneous RT release and LE debridement. RESULTS: The prevalence of RTS in a representative United States insurance database was 0.091%, and the annual incidence was 0.0091%. There were 75,459 patients identified with an active RTS diagnosis. The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 52 years (range, 18-81 years), 55% were women, and 1,833 patients (2.4%) underwent RT release within 1 year. Fewer than 3% of the patients received an injection within 30 days of RTS diagnosis. The 90-day postoperative complication rates were low: 5% of the patients required hospital readmission and 2.1% underwent revision surgery. Approximately 5.7% of the patients with RTS also had a diagnosis of LE on the same side within 6 months of RTS diagnosis. In patients with ipsilateral RTS and LE who underwent surgery, 59.1% underwent simultaneous RT release and LE debridement, whereas 40.9% underwent isolated radial tunnel release. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of a large insurance database showed that the diagnosis of RTS is rarely assigned, suggesting that the incidence of this nerve compression is low. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic III.

Assessing the Risk of Postoperative Complications for Proximal Humeral Fractures Treated by Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Patients With Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) has markedly risen over the past three decades. Patients with DM and CKD are at increased risk of infection, immune dysfunction, as well as bone and mineral disorders. Although we know that patients with DM and CKD have these risks, we do not know how these translate to proximal humeral fracture (PHF) healing. We sought to analyze whether these established comorbidities had increased rates of complications after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for PHF treatment. METHODS: Using a national insurance database, 72,365 patients with PHF managed with ORIF were identified using records from 2010 to 2022. Patients were initially split into those with DM and those without and were further stratified by the presence or absence of CKD. For our comparison baseline cohort, patients were not diagnosed with either DM or CKD. Post-ORIF complication rates were assessed looking specifically at nonunion, postoperative infection, and all-cause revision surgery. A logistic regression statistical analysis was also conducted. RESULTS: Of the 72,365 patients with PHF treated by ORIF, 41,047 were non-DM without CKD (comparison); 17,025 had DM alone (no CKD); 11,729 had DM and CKD; and 2564 had CKD alone (non-DM). Multivariate analysis indicated that patients with DM and/or CKD were at increased risk of developing nonunion (odds ratio [OR] = 1.37, 1.48, 1.23) and all-cause revision surgery (OR = 1.21, 1.11, 1.18) after ORIF for PHF compared with our comparison cohort. In addition, all patients with DM alone (non-CKD) and DM with CKD had an increased risk of postoperative infection (OR = 1.39, 1.26). CONCLUSION: The management of PHF is a controversial topic, particularly regarding the degree of intervention and optimal treatment choice. Regardless, using a pragmatic design and reviewing a national insurance database, this study provides information for patients in high-risk populations, specifically patients with DM and CKD, and may prove beneficial when selecting a patient-specific treatment plan. Additional studies are needed to assess varying stages of both DM and CKD in patients who sustain PHF treated by ORIF along with postoperative strategies to minimize complications.

Comparison between micro-anchor skin dressing and liquid bonding agent for elective knee arthroscopy portal closure.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current study was to evaluate outcomes of elective knee arthroscopy portal closure comparing two skin closure techniques. METHOD: This was a randomised controlled trial including healthy volunteers aged ≥18 years undergoing elective knee arthroscopy that used two portals. At the time of surgery, each patient's two arthroscopy portal closures were randomised to one of two closure techniques; the first technique used approximation of the skin with a micro-anchor skin dressing (BandGrip Inc., US), while the second closure technique used an absorbable suture (Biosyn Monofilament, Medtronic) and a liquid bonding agent skin closure (Dermabond, Ethicon Inc., US). Postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at the first visit after knee arthroscopy and at six weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients (76 portals) were enrolled in this study. No patients reported wound complications of either portal; thus, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) in wound complication rates between the skin closure techniques. Survey questions regarding any difference in appearance and cosmesis between the closure techniques' portal sites were responded to by 15 patients, all of whom indicated no difference in appearance between the portal sites. There was also no statistically significant difference between the two closure techniques with regards to appearance. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in presence of wound complications or appearance between skin closure with the micro-anchor skin dressing and the absorbable suture/liquid bonding agent skin closure.

Total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fractures in the older population: timing of intervention may improve patient outcomes.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates complication rates following treatment modalities of THA for acetabular fractures in the older population. METHODS: A national insurance database was used to identify acetabular fracture patients of age > 50 who underwent THA treatment within two years of fracture. Four subgroups were identified: primary THA < 2 months after injury (acute THA), primary THA > 2 months after injury (delayed THA), simultaneous ORIF and THA, and conversion THA after ORIF (THA after ORIF). A 3:1 match was performed between these subgroups and patients undergoing THA for non-fracture causes. Patients were matched based on age, gender and the diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, obesity or tobacco use. Complication rates were compared, including hospital readmission, revision, infection and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). RESULTS: In total, 3807 patients met inclusion criteria and were matched with 11,421 controls. Compared to controls, acute THA and delayed THA patients had significantly increased rates of all complications (OR ranges 1.45 - 2.82, p < 0.001). Simultaneous ORIF and THA and THA after ORIF patients had significantly increased rates of revision, infection and DVT (OR ranges 1.76 - 3.96, p ranges < 0.001 - p = 0.031). Compared to delayed THA, acute THA patients had significantly higher rates of readmission (OR = 1.16, p = 0.021) and DVT (OR = 1.89, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Consistent with prior literature, THA after acetabular fracture is associated with higher complication rates than THA for non-fracture causes. Acute THA following acetabular fracture is also associated with higher rates of readmission and DVT than delayed THA.

Effect of Body Mass Index on Femur Fracture Location: A Retrospective Database Study.

OBJECTIVES: Use a large database design and multivariable analyses to assess the associations between body mass index (BMI) and femur fracture patterns after controlling for other risk factors. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: National insurance claims database of patient records from 2010 to 2018. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients with femur fracture diagnoses were identified. Patients with multiple fractures within 1 week (polytrauma patients), patients without a BMI diagnosis code within 6 months of fracture, and patients with multiple BMI diagnosis codes (implying a substantial change in weight) were excluded. INTERVENTION: N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Patients were divided into groups based on fracture location: proximal (OTA/AO 31), shaft (OTA/AO 32), or distal (OTA/AO 33). The distribution of femur fractures was compared across BMI categories. RESULTS: A total of 57,042 patients with femur fracture were identified: 45,586 proximal fractures, 4216 shaft fractures, and 7240 distal fractures. Patients with BMI <29.9 have increased odds ( P < 0.0001) of proximal fracture and decreased odds ( P < 0.0001) of shaft or distal fractures. Patients with BMI >30.0 have decreased odds ( P < 0.0001) of proximal fracture and increased odds ( P < 0.0001) of distal fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing BMI is associated with a decreased proportion of proximal femur fractures and a corresponding increase in the proportion of shaft and distal fractures. Regression analyses determined that age, sex, osteoporosis, diabetes, and tobacco use are not the cause of this trend. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.